Hukuman Rajam Terhadap Pelaku Zina Muhsan (Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Siyasah Syar’iyah)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47766/tanfidziy.v2i2.2291Keywords:
The Law of Stoning, Human Rights, Perspective, Siyasah Syar’iyah , Zina MuhsanAbstract
The main problem in this study is how to carry out stoning punishment against adulterers muhsan by taking into account the principles of Human Rights (HAM), as well as examining the problem of stoning regulation as a punishment, seeing it in the view of Human Rights and Islamic Criminal Law. This research is qualitative and based on philosophical theory and phenomenology, which is a theory oriented to be able to get an explanation of the reality that appears. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of stoning punishment against adulterers muhsan is seen as an inhumane punishment based on international regulations such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and others. In the perspective of Siyasah Shar'iyah, the imposition of stoning punishment on the perpetrators of adultery muhsan can provide benefits in maintaining honor and offspring. In this case the implementation of stoning punishment can be categorized as part of siyasah shar'iyah with consideration of hifzu al-nasl (preserving offspring) in society.
References
Al-Bukhari, A. A. Shahih Al-Bukhari. Semarang: Toha Putra, n.d.
Al-Kitab. Jakarta: Lembaga Percetakan Al-Kitab Indonesia, 1995.
Ali Abubakar, Badrul Munir dan Cempaka Sari Harahap. “Sanksi Bagi Pelaku Zina (Perbandingan Qanun No. 6 Tahun 2014 Dan Enakmen Jenayah Syariah Negeri Selangor No. 9 Tahun 1995 Seksyen 25).” Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah 3, no. 2 (2018): 2549–8274. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v3i2.54.
Andrea, Fockema. Kamus Istilah Hukum. Bandung: Binacipta, 1983.
Damang Averroes Al-Khawarizmi. “Konsep Hak Asasi Manusia.” negarahukum.com, 2011. https://www.negarahukum.com/konsep-hak-asasi-manusia.html.
Hamdiah A. Latif. “Hukuman Rajam Dalam Al-Qur’an Dan Sunnah: Suatu Ikhtiar Pembacaan Ulang.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu’ashirah: Media Kajian Al-Qur’an Dan Al-Hadits Multi Perspektif 16, no. 1–11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v16i1.5736.
Jafar, Wahyu Abdul. “Fiqh Siyasah Dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an Dan Al-Hadist.” Al Imarah : Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik Islam 3, no. 1 (2018): 18. https://doi.org/10.29300/imr.v3i1.2140.
Latif, H. A. “Hukuman Rajam Dalam Al-Qur’an Dan Sunnah: Suatu Ikhtiar Pembacaan Ulang.” Al-Mua’shirah 5 (2019).
M-1. “Pelaksanaan DUHAM Masih Memprihatinkan.” Hukumonline, 2008. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pelaksanaan-duham-masih-memprihatinkan--hol20713/?page=2.
Ma’luf, L. Al-Munjid Fi Al-Lughah. Beirut: Dar al-Masyriq, 1986.
Mubarok, Jaih. Sejarah Hukum Islam. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2000.
Muhtaj, Majda El. Dimensi-Dimensi HAM. Rajawali, 2008.
Pius A Partanto, M. D. Kamus Ilmiah Populer. Surabaya: Arkola, 1994.
Roham, A. Pembicaraan Sekitar Bible Dan Qur-an Dalam Segi Isi Dan Riwayat Penulisnya. . Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1984.
Rulam Ahmadi. Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2014.
Rusyd, Ibnu. Bidayah Al Mujtahid Wa Nihayah Al Muqtasid. Beirut: Muassasah Risalah, 1989.
Simon Purba, Mustamam, Adil Akhyar. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Perzinahan Dalam Perspektif Kuhp Dan Qanun Di Lhoksukon Aceh Utara.” Metadata 3, no. 2 (2021): 651–68. https://doi.org/10.47652/metadata.v3i2.
Syafi’i, Jalaluddin Abdurrahman As Suyuthi As. Tanwirul Hawalik Syarh “ala Muwaththa” Malik. Beirut: Dar el-Fikr, 1994.
William Chang. Metologi Penulisan Ilmiah. Cetakan I. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2015.
Wiranto, Muhammad, and Nasri Akib. “Larangan Mendekati Zina Dalam Q.S Al-Isra’/17:32 (Analisis Kajian Tahlili).” El-Maqra Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Hadis Dan Teologi 2, no. 1 (2022): 33–51. https://doi.org/10.31332/elmaqra.v2i1.3989.
Zahrah, Abu. Al-Jarimah Wa Al-Uqubah Fi Al-Fiqh Al-Islami. Mesir: Dar al-Fikr, n.d.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andi Mardika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
