Tinjauan Filosofis: Komparasi Pemikiran Maurice Bucaille dan Allama Tabatabai terhadap Sains dan Al-Qur’an

Daud Kurniadi Yudistiro  Bakti; Syamil  Harahap

doi:10.47766/almabhats.v8i2.1996

Authors

Daud Kurniadi Yudistiro Bakti Universitas Islam 45 Bekasi
Syamil Harahap Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47766/almabhats.v8i2.1996

Keywords:

Allama Tabatabai, Al-Qur’an, Epistimologi, Ilmu Pengetahuan, Maurice Bucaille

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this study is to philosophically and comparatively examine the perspectives of Maurice Bucaille and Allama Tabatabai on the relationship between Science and the Qur'an. The research employs an interpretative paradigm and utilizes the literature review. The data were obtained from research findings published in books and journals. The search parameters consist of the keywords Science, Al-Qur'an, Philosophy, Maurice Bucaille's Thought, and Allama Tabatabai. The results demonstrated that science acquires its veracity by employing empirical methodologies and objectively evaluating information. In Islamic teachings, science is inherently integrated with its principles. Bucaille unveiled that the Qur'an promotes the exploration of natural phenomena and their constituents as a means for humans to discern evidence of the omniscience of God through the application of their cognitive faculties. The proper exploration of nature and subsequent development of science and technology will be achieved through the application of systematic and focused thinking. Tabatabai stated that the most precise method to understand the concepts and goals of the Qur'an, as well as its connection with science, is by interpreting it using the Qur'an itself and drawing from the biographies of religious leaders who have provided interpretations.

Abstrak: Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengalisis secara filosofis dan komparatif pandangan Maurice Bucaille dan Allama Tabatabai terhadap Sains dan Al Qur’an. Penelitian menggunakan paradigma interpretative dengan metode kepustakaan. Data dikumpulkan melalui hasil penelitian dalam bentuk buku dan jurnal. Adapun kata kunci yang menjadi parameter pencarian data adalah Sains, Al-Qur’an, Filosofi, Pemikiran Maurice Bucaille dan Allama Tabatabai. Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan Sains memperoleh kebenarannya melalui metode empiris, menilai informasi secara objektif. Dalam ajaran Islam, sains tidak dipisahkan dari prinsip-prinsipnya. Bucaille mengungkapkan ayat Al-Qur’an mendorong manusia mencari tanda-tanda kekuasaan Allah melalui perenungan atas fenomena alam beserta isinya dengan kekuatan akalnya. Dengan hasil pemikiran yang sistematis dan terarah, eksplorasi alam pun akan tercapai secara baik yang diikuti dengan perkembangan sains dan teknologi. Sementara Tabatabai menungkapkan tafsir Al-Qur'an dengan menggunakan Al-Qur'an sendiri, yang berasal dari biografi interpretatif para pemimpin agama, adalah cara yang paling akurat untuk mencapai konsep-konsep dan tujuan-tujuan Al-Qur'an termasuk hubungannya dengan ilmu pengetahuan.

References

The “Scientific Miracle of the Qurʾān.” (2017). In Islamic Studies Today: Essays in Honor of Andrew Rippin (pp. 339–353). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004337121_018

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (2005). Islamic Philosophy: An Introduction. Journal of Islamic Philosophy, 1(1), 11–43.

Al-Attas, S. N. (2003). Filsafat dan Praktik Pendidikan Islam, terj. Wan Mohd Nor Wan Daud. Cet ke-1,. Mizan Pustaka.

Ali Wafa. (2023). Integration of Religious Knowledge with Science and Technology in Islamic Education. Maklumat: Journal of Da’wah and Islamic Studies, 1(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.61166/maklumat.v1i1.2

Azizah, F. R. (2019). Mengembangkan Paradigma Integratif-Interkonektif dalam Pendidikan Islam di Perguruan Tinggi (Pendekatan Interdisipliner dalam Studi Islam). Al-Tarbawi Al-Haditsah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 18–34.

Bakar, O. (2008). Tawhid and Science Islamic Perspectives on Religion and Science. Arah Pendidikan Sdn Bhd.

Bigliardi, S. (2011). Snakes From Staves? Science, Scriptures, and The Supernatural In Maurice Bucaille. Zygon®, 46(4), 793–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2011.01218.x

Bigliardi, S. (2017). 17 The “Scientific Miracle of the Qurʾān.” In Islamic Studies Today: Essays in Honor of Andrew Rippin (pp. 339–353). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004337121_018

Bowie, F. (2021). Anthropology of Religion. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Study of Religion (pp. 1–24). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119092797.ch1

Chaney, E. (2016). Religion and The Rise and Fall of Islamic Science. Work. Pap., Dep. Econ., Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA.

Daneshgar, M., & Saleh, W. (2016). Islamic Studies Today: Essays in Honor of Andrew Rippin (Vol. 11). Brill.

Daud, W. M. N. W. (2013). Islamisasi Ilmu-ilmu Kontemporer dan Peran Universitas Islam dalam Konteks Dewesternisasi dan Dekolonisasi. CASIS UTM.

Faghih, I. M. R., Karimi, B. M., & Izadi, M. (2022). The Foundation of Affection in the Anthropological Theory of Allamah Tabatabai and its Social Implications.

Gardner, V., Mayes, E. C., & Hameed, S. (2018). Preaching Science and Islam: Dr. Zakir Naik and Discourses of Science and Islam in Internet Videos. Die Welt Des Islams, 58(3), 357–391. https://doi.org/10.22091/JPTR.2022.8225.2715

Goodenough, W. H. (1992). Belief, Practice, and Religion. Zygon�, 27(3), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1992.tb01067.x

Hardaker, G., & Sabki, A. A. (2018). Philosophy of Islam and Knowledge. In Pedagogy in Islamic Education (pp. 35–54). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-531-120181004

Iqbal, M. (2018). Islam and Science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315195698

Khaitovich, A. M. (2023). Ontological and Epistemological Views of Tabatabai. Miasto Przyszłości, 36, 77–83. http://miastoprzyszlosci.com.pl/index.php/mp/article/view/1471

Kosim, M., Kustati, M., & Murkilim, M. (2021). Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas’ Ideas on The Islamization of Knowledge And Its Relevance With Islamic Education in Indonesia. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 44(2), 250. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v44i2.724

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Vol. 111). Chicago University of Chicago Press.

Kurniawan, H. (2019). Pandangan Maurice Bucaille Tentang Kesesuaian Al–Qur’an dengan Ilmu Pengetahuan (Sains) [UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA]. https://doi.org/10.22034/QVE.2021.5371

Kurzman, C. (2019). Sociologies of Islam. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022641

Madjid, N. (2019). Khasanah Intelektual Islam.

McClure, P. K. (2017). Tinkering with Technology and Religion in the Digital Age: The Effects of Internet Use on Religious Belief, Behavior, and Belonging. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56(3), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12365

Mohammad, A. (2020). Qur’an on Embryology: A Study of Qur’anic and Modern concept of Human Development. Journal of Islam and Science, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24252/jis.v7i1.14196

Mortazavi, N. S. (2021). A Comparative Study of The Scientific Interpretation of Verses from The Perspective of Allameh Tabatabai And Maurice Bucaille. THe Qur’an And Science, 14(27), 205–230.

Mostafaei, M., Rabbanikhah, A., & Shahrabadi, F. (2022). Allamah Tabatabai ’ s Principles in Choosing Similar Verses as in the Interpretation of the First Hundred Verses of Surah Al-Baqarah. Journal of Quranic Studies Quarterly Islamic Azad University in Jiroft, 13(50). https://doi.org/10.30495/QSF.2022.1961367.2887

Neuwirth, A. (2017). 7 The Qurʾān’s Enchantment of the World. In Islamic Studies Today: Essays in Honor of Andrew Rippin (pp. 123–144). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004337121_008

Noble, D. F. (2013). The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention. Knopf.

Qommi, H. A., & Dirbaz, A. (2019). Reasoning and Reflection Regarding Issues of Faith: a Comparison between the Views of Allamah Tabatabai and Gabriel Marcel.

Razaq, A. (2017). Penciptaan Alam Semesta dalam al-Quran (Studi Pemikiranan Sains Maurice Bucaille). Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember.

Rizvi, S. (2020). Epistemology According to Allamah Tabatabai. Kom : Casopis Za Religijske Nauke, 9(2), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.5937/kom2001027R

Saliba, G. (2007). Islamic Science and The Making of the European Renaissance. MIT Press.

Salimi, Z., & Mir Hosseini, S. M. (2020). The Relationship between Literature and the Qur’an (Study of Expression Science with a Look at the Opinions of Allameh Tabatabai and Alusi). Stylistics Studies of the Holy Quran, 3(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/1022034/sshq.2020.121951

Sharokhi, A., & Akbari Aqdam, K. (2022). Intuitive Knowledge According to Allamah Tabatabai and Rejecting Claims Disaffirming Its Validity. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 24(4), 75–100.

Stone, L. A. (2002). The Islamic Crescent: Islam, Culture and Globalization. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 15(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351161022000001269

Sukamto, A. (2009). Agama dan Modernitas: Spiritualitas Transformatif Ala Nurcholish Madjid. Jurnal Transformasi, 5(1), 85–98.

Suprayogo, I. (2012). Membangun Peradaban dari Pojok Tradisi. UIN-Maliki Press.

Wijaya, M. M. (2022). Integration of Science and Religion in Methodological Review: Analysis of Miracle Verses. Nizham Journal of Islamic Studies, 10(02), 36. https://doi.org/10.32332/nizham.v10i02.5449

Zarkasyi, H. F. (2003). Filsafat dan Praktik Pendidikan Islam Syed Mohammed Naser. Naquib Al-Attas. Bandung: Mizan Media Utama.

Zarkasyi, H. F. (2012). Misykat: Refleksi tentang Islam Westernisasi & Liberalisasi. INSISTS.